[docs] RuboCop now uses prism as a first-class (translation) parser#3599
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
I agree that this section may not make much sense now that no configuration is needed and RuboCop just uses Prism automatically. My vote goes for removing it entirely. |
Since rubocop 1.75 it just does the right thing, so no need to specifically call it out anymore.
Earlopain
force-pushed
the
parser-translator-rubocop
branch
from
July 17, 2025 17:23
bc3f71f to
34ae2dc
Compare
Collaborator
Author
|
👍 I removed the section completly |
vinistock
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2025
rafaelfranca
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2025
Collaborator
|
Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since rubocop 1.75 it just does the right thing, so no need to mention much of the old configuration anymore. See rubocop/rubocop#14035
I'm also open to removing this section entirely, I don't think it provides much value anymore.